TOOTH VS TOOTH

Shortfin makoversusLongfin mako

Two original visual plates. Ten comparison fields. One careful verdict.

Shortfin mako profile →
FRONT / LABIAL VIEWEDGE / PROFILESMOOTH EDGEPOSITION CHANGES SHAPE● ANTERIOR● LATERALTUFFSHARK ORIGINAL TOOTH PLATEDIAGRAMMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Original TuffShark vector illustration. Trait emphasis is diagrammatic; it is not a specimen photograph or a substitute for an associated jaw.
VS
Longfin mako profile →
FRONT / LABIAL VIEWEDGE / PROFILESMOOTH EDGEPOSITION CHANGES SHAPE● ANTERIOR● LATERALTUFFSHARK ORIGINAL TOOTH PLATEDIAGRAMMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Original TuffShark vector illustration. Trait emphasis is diagrammatic; it is not a specimen photograph or a substitute for an associated jaw.
IDENTIFICATION VERDICT

These teeth overlap in both broad form and edge treatment. Root proportions, jaw position, size, age and locality must carry more weight than silhouette alone.

FIELD MARKShortfin makoLongfin mako
Signature

Slender, smooth-edged crown that often flexes or curves, with no side cusplets.

Smooth, narrow lamnid tooth; generally broader and less strongly flexed than comparable shortfin-mako teeth.

Crown

Narrow dagger / Hooked blade

Narrow dagger / Hooked blade

Edge

Smooth edge

Smooth edge

Cusplets

No side cusplets

No side cusplets

Root

Rounded U-shaped root / Two distinct root lobes

Rounded U-shaped root / Two distinct root lobes

Tooth height

12–52 mm reference range

10–45 mm reference range

Jaw variation

Anterior teeth are slender and flexed; laterals become broader and flatter.

Anterior teeth are narrow; lateral teeth broaden, with heavy overlap with shortfin mako.

Habitat

Temperate and tropical offshore waters worldwide.

Tropical and warm-temperate offshore waters.

Diet

Fast fishes, squid and occasionally other sharks or marine mammals.

Pelagic fishes and squid.

Shark size

Commonly 2–3.2 m (6.5–10.5 ft); exceptional individuals are larger.

Commonly 2.2–3 m (7–10 ft); confirmed maximums are uncertain.

Bite force

No reliable species-specific value is established; bite force changes with body size and bite point.

No reliable species-specific value is established; bite force changes with body size and bite point.

Fossils

Fossil teeth are reported, but isolated teeth may only be identifiable to genus or family.

Sparse; isolated Isurus teeth may not be species-identifiable.

SHORTFIN MAKO TRAP

A single worn tooth may be difficult to separate from extinct makos, threshers and some sand-tiger relatives.

LONGFIN MAKO TRAP

Body characters—not an isolated tooth—are usually needed to separate living longfin and shortfin makos confidently.

SOURCE / Shortfin makoFlorida Museum
SOURCE / Longfin makoFlorida Museum

Illustrations are original TuffShark diagrams, not photographs taken from either reference.

+

KEEP COMPARING

Other difficult tooth pairs.

Great white sharkversusTiger sharkOpen →MegalodonversusGreat white sharkOpen →Bull sharkversusDusky sharkOpen →Bull sharkversusOceanic whitetipOpen →