Smooth, narrow lamnid tooth; generally broader and less strongly flexed than comparable shortfin-mako teeth.
Body characters—not an isolated tooth—are usually needed to separate living longfin and shortfin makos confidently.
01
ORIGINAL VISUAL PLATE
Front, edge and jaw position.
02
IDENTIFICATION TRAITS
What to inspect.
- Crown shape
- Narrow dagger or Hooked blade
- Cutting edge
- Smooth edge
- Side cusplets
- No side cusplets
- Root
- Rounded U-shaped root or Two distinct root lobes
- Reference tooth height
- About 10–45 mm, depending on age and jaw position
- Jaw variation
- Anterior teeth are narrow; lateral teeth broaden, with heavy overlap with shortfin mako.
03
ECOLOGY + SCALE
The shark behind the tooth.
- Habitat
- Tropical and warm-temperate offshore waters.
- Diet
- Pelagic fishes and squid.
- Estimated shark size
- Commonly 2.2–3 m (7–10 ft); confirmed maximums are uncertain.
- Bite force
- No reliable species-specific value is established; bite force changes with body size and bite point.
- Fossil occurrence
- Sparse; isolated Isurus teeth may not be species-identifiable.
- Time range
- Living; fossil occurrence is sparse
04
FUNCTION
Form follows feeding.
Upper and lower teeth differ by position and overlap heavily with shortfin mako. An isolated tooth rarely supports a confident species-level mako identification.
05
LOOKALIKES
Do not stop at the first match.
06
DIRECT COMPARISONS
Put it beside its closest rival.
AUTHORITATIVE REFERENCE
Open source ↗Florida Museum
The visual plate is original TuffShark artwork and is not copied from the reference. Use the source alongside formation age, locality and associated material.
HAVE A TOOTH TO CHECK?
Start a ranked identification →