TOOTH VS TOOTH

Great white sharkversusTiger shark

Two original visual plates. Ten comparison fields. One careful verdict.

Great white shark profile →
FRONT / LABIAL VIEWEDGE / PROFILECOARSE EDGEPOSITION CHANGES SHAPE● ANTERIOR● LATERALTUFFSHARK ORIGINAL TOOTH PLATEDIAGRAMMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Original TuffShark vector illustration. Trait emphasis is diagrammatic; it is not a specimen photograph or a substitute for an associated jaw.
VS
Tiger shark profile →
FRONT / LABIAL VIEWEDGE / PROFILECOARSE EDGEPOSITION CHANGES SHAPE● ANTERIOR● LATERALTUFFSHARK ORIGINAL TOOTH PLATEDIAGRAMMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Original TuffShark vector illustration. Trait emphasis is diagrammatic; it is not a specimen photograph or a substitute for an associated jaw.
IDENTIFICATION VERDICT

The strongest separator is overall crown shape. Confirm it against the root and jaw-position notes before naming an isolated tooth.

FIELD MARKGreat white sharkTiger shark
Signature

Flat, broad triangular blade with coarse serrations and no lateral cusplets.

A strongly curved, can-opener profile with a deep outer notch and compound serrations.

Crown

Broad triangle

Deeply notched blade

Edge

Coarse serrations

Coarse serrations / Uneven / mixed serrations

Cusplets

No side cusplets

No side cusplets

Root

Deep V-shaped root / Wide / nearly flat root

Wide / nearly flat root / Two distinct root lobes

Tooth height

18–76 mm reference range

10–40 mm reference range

Jaw variation

Upper teeth are broad cutting triangles; lower teeth are narrower and more erect.

Upper and lower teeth share the same deeply notched can-opener design.

Habitat

Temperate and subtropical coastal and offshore waters.

Tropical and warm-temperate coasts, reefs, shelves and open water.

Diet

Fishes, rays, seals, sea lions and carrion; diet changes with age.

Fishes, turtles, rays, seabirds, marine mammals and carrion.

Shark size

Large adults commonly 4–5 m (13–16 ft); exceptional individuals exceed 6 m.

Usually 3–4.5 m (10–15 ft); the largest verified animals are larger.

Bite force

Up to about 18,000 N predicted for a very large individual in a computer model—not measured in a living shark.

No reliable species-specific value is established; bite force changes with body size and bite point.

Fossils

Teeth occur from the Pliocene to Recent and may be mineral stained.

Galeocerdo teeth are common in Neogene marine deposits.

GREAT WHITE SHARK TRAP

Position in the jaw changes the outline substantially. Fossil great-white teeth may be dark or mineral stained.

TIGER SHARK TRAP

Heavy wear can erase the small secondary serrations, but the hooked, notched silhouette usually remains diagnostic.

SOURCE / Great white sharkFlorida Museum
SOURCE / Tiger sharkFlorida Museum

Illustrations are original TuffShark diagrams, not photographs taken from either reference.

+

KEEP COMPARING

Other difficult tooth pairs.

MegalodonversusGreat white sharkOpen →Bull sharkversusDusky sharkOpen →Bull sharkversusOceanic whitetipOpen →Bull sharkversusGreat hammerheadOpen →