Tiger shark is about 1.24× longer by these reference values.
Tiger shark uses a 5.5 m upper reference, compared with 4.45 m for Shortfin mako. Tiger shark's weight reference is about 1.58× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Shortfin mako is represented by reported to about 4.45 m / 14.6 ft; Tiger shark by largest specimens exceed 5.5 m / 18 ft. Record length and mass do not necessarily describe the same individual. Both values describe exceptional animals, not an average adult.
Bite evidence
Shortfin mako: No directly comparable maximum bite-force estimate is used. Tiger shark: Popular figures are often repeated without a traceable species-level method.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Speed is its signature; the biggest animals are unusual and hard to verify. Its broad diet is real; an exact maximum bite number is not well established.
TRACE THE CLAIMS