Shortfin mako is about 1.11× longer by these reference values.
Shortfin mako uses a 4.45 m upper reference, compared with 4 m for Oceanic whitetip. Shortfin mako's weight reference is about 3.4× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Oceanic whitetip is represented by reported to 4 m / 13 ft; Shortfin mako by reported to about 4.45 m / 14.6 ft. The comparison deliberately distinguishes the record from common size. Record length and mass do not necessarily describe the same individual.
Bite evidence
Oceanic whitetip: A traceable, species-wide maximum is not available. Shortfin mako: No directly comparable maximum bite-force estimate is used.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Most individuals are under 3 m even though larger records exist. Speed is its signature; the biggest animals are unusual and hard to verify.
TRACE THE CLAIMS