White shark is about 1.09× longer by these reference values.
White shark uses a 6 m upper reference, compared with 5.5 m for Tiger shark. White shark's weight reference is about 2.5× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Tiger shark is represented by largest specimens exceed 5.5 m / 18 ft; White shark by about 6 m / 20 ft. Both values describe exceptional animals, not an average adult. Maximum length and mass are exceptional upper-end figures.
Bite evidence
Tiger shark: Popular figures are often repeated without a traceable species-level method. White shark: A 3-D finite-element model predicted the bite of a very large individual; it was not measured on a living shark.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Its broad diet is real; an exact maximum bite number is not well established. Its headline bite number is a computer model, not a live-animal measurement.
TRACE THE CLAIMS