Tiger shark is about 1.38× longer by these reference values.
Tiger shark uses a 5.5 m upper reference, compared with 4 m for Bull shark. Tiger shark's weight reference is about 2.8× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT SETS THEM APART
More than a size contest.
Length and weight
Bull shark is represented by reported to 4 m / 13 ft; Tiger shark by largest specimens exceed 5.5 m / 18 ft. The 4 m figure is a reported maximum; typical mature animals are smaller. Both values describe exceptional animals, not an average adult.
Habitat and diet
Bull shark: Coasts, estuaries and freshwater; fish, rays, turtles and other sharks. Tiger shark: Tropical and warm-temperate seas; turtles, fishes, birds, carrion and more.
Bite evidence
Bull shark: The upper value is a theoretical posterior bite for the largest specimen in a 73–285 cm study series—not a universal adult bite. Tiger shark: Popular figures are often repeated without a traceable species-level method.
Records are not averages
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
TRACE THE CLAIMS