White shark is about 1.35× longer by these reference values.
White shark uses a 6 m upper reference, compared with 4.45 m for Shortfin mako. White shark's weight reference is about 4.0× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Shortfin mako is represented by reported to about 4.45 m / 14.6 ft; White shark by about 6 m / 20 ft. Record length and mass do not necessarily describe the same individual. Maximum length and mass are exceptional upper-end figures.
Bite evidence
Shortfin mako: No directly comparable maximum bite-force estimate is used. White shark: A 3-D finite-element model predicted the bite of a very large individual; it was not measured on a living shark.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Speed is its signature; the biggest animals are unusual and hard to verify. Its headline bite number is a computer model, not a live-animal measurement.
TRACE THE CLAIMS