TOOTH VS TOOTH

MegalodonversusOtodus obliquus

Two original visual plates. Ten comparison fields. One careful verdict.

Megalodon profile →
FRONT / LABIAL VIEWEDGE / PROFILEFINE EDGEPOSITION CHANGES SHAPE● ANTERIOR● LATERALTUFFSHARK ORIGINAL TOOTH PLATEDIAGRAMMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Original TuffShark vector illustration. Trait emphasis is diagrammatic; it is not a specimen photograph or a substitute for an associated jaw.
VS
Otodus obliquus profile →
FRONT / LABIAL VIEWEDGE / PROFILESMOOTH EDGEPOSITION CHANGES SHAPE● ANTERIOR● LATERALTUFFSHARK ORIGINAL TOOTH PLATEDIAGRAMMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
Original TuffShark vector illustration. Trait emphasis is diagrammatic; it is not a specimen photograph or a substitute for an associated jaw.
IDENTIFICATION VERDICT

The strongest separator is the cutting edge. Confirm it against the root and jaw-position notes before naming an isolated tooth.

FIELD MARKMegalodonOtodus obliquus
Signature

Massive triangular crown, regular serrations, thick root and often a visible bourlette between crown and root.

Large smooth triangular main crown with a prominent cusplet on each side and a heavy root.

Crown

Broad triangle

Broad triangle

Edge

Fine serrations / Coarse serrations

Smooth edge

Cusplets

No side cusplets

One on each side

Root

Deep V-shaped root / Wide / nearly flat root

Deep V-shaped root / Wide / nearly flat root

Tooth height

45–180 mm reference range

25–100 mm reference range

Jaw variation

Anterior teeth are tall and symmetrical; laterals broaden and become oblique.

Anterior teeth are tall and symmetrical; lateral teeth broaden and lean.

Habitat

Warm temperate to tropical coastal and offshore seas worldwide.

Paleocene–Eocene warm marine shelves and open seas.

Diet

Large marine mammals, fishes and other sharks.

Large fishes and marine vertebrates inferred.

Shark size

Most evidence-based reconstructions cluster around 15–18 m (49–59 ft), with larger claims more uncertain.

Often estimated at roughly 8–10 m (26–33 ft), but complete bodies are unknown.

Bite force

About 108,000–182,000 N in one scaled biomechanical model—not a direct measurement.

Not directly measurable and not safely inferred from tooth size alone.

Fossils

Miocene–Pliocene teeth are widespread in marine deposits on several continents.

Widespread Paleocene–Eocene teeth, commonly with paired cusplets.

MEGALODON TRAP

Large size alone is not enough. Broken roots, juvenile teeth and worn serrations can make megalodon overlap with other otodontids.

OTODUS OBLIQUUS TRAP

Later transitional otodontids may develop serrations or reduce cusplets, making lineage-level ID safer.

SOURCE / MegalodonSmithsonian Ocean
SOURCE / Otodus obliquusPaleobiology Database

Illustrations are original TuffShark diagrams, not photographs taken from either reference.

+

KEEP COMPARING

Other difficult tooth pairs.

Great white sharkversusTiger sharkOpen →MegalodonversusGreat white sharkOpen →Bull sharkversusDusky sharkOpen →Bull sharkversusOceanic whitetipOpen →