Tiger shark is about 1.38× longer by these reference values.
Tiger shark uses a 5.5 m upper reference, compared with 4 m for Oceanic whitetip. Tiger shark's weight reference is about 5.4× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Oceanic whitetip is represented by reported to 4 m / 13 ft; Tiger shark by largest specimens exceed 5.5 m / 18 ft. The comparison deliberately distinguishes the record from common size. Both values describe exceptional animals, not an average adult.
Bite evidence
Oceanic whitetip: A traceable, species-wide maximum is not available. Tiger shark: Popular figures are often repeated without a traceable species-level method.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Most individuals are under 3 m even though larger records exist. Its broad diet is real; an exact maximum bite number is not well established.
TRACE THE CLAIMS