Otodus obliquus is about 4.3× longer by these reference values.
Otodus obliquus uses a 9.1 m upper reference, compared with 2.13 m for Whitetip reef shark. A clean mass ratio is not shown because at least one weight is not reliably reconstructed.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Otodus obliquus is represented by estimated to about 9.1 m / 30 ft; Whitetip reef shark by reported to 2.13 m / 7 ft. Soft-body dimensions are inferred from teeth and living analogues. The species is usually smaller than its reported maximum.
Bite evidence
Otodus obliquus: No species-specific model is used. Whitetip reef shark: No standardized maximum is used.
Living versus extinct
At least one animal is known from fossils. Fossil length, weight and bite estimates depend on which living analogues and scaling equations researchers choose.
Ecology changes the matchup
It belonged to the megatooth lineage that later produced megalodon. Its slim body lets it hunt inside reef crevices.
TRACE THE CLAIMS