Megalodon is about 4.8× longer by these reference values.
Megalodon uses a 15.3 m upper reference, compared with 3.2 m for Sand tiger shark. Megalodon's weight reference is about 302× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT SETS THEM APART
More than a size contest.
Length and weight
Megalodon is represented by evidence-based upper estimate 14.1–15.3 m / 46–50 ft; Sand tiger shark by reported to about 3.2 m / 10.5 ft. No complete skeleton exists; 15.3 m is an evidence-based maximum from museum specimens, not a tape measurement. Upper records vary by region and source.
Habitat and diet
Megalodon: Warm and temperate seas worldwide; large marine mammals, turtles and fishes. Sand tiger shark: Temperate and subtropical coasts; fishes, rays, squid and crustaceans.
Bite evidence
Megalodon: Finite-element scaling produced a range, not a directly measured bite. Sand tiger shark: A reliable comparable maximum was not found.
Fossils change the certainty
At least one animal is known from fossils. Fossil length, weight and bite estimates depend on which living analogues and scaling equations researchers choose.
TRACE THE CLAIMS