Great hammerhead is about 1.02× longer by these reference values.
These animals are effectively close in maximum-length terms, so measurement uncertainty can matter more than the apparent difference. White shark's weight reference is about 5.0× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Great hammerhead is represented by reported to 6.1 m / 20 ft; White shark by about 6 m / 20 ft. The comparison uses the largest reported length and a record mass. Maximum length and mass are exceptional upper-end figures.
Bite evidence
Great hammerhead: Comparative biomechanics exist, but a simple verified maximum is not established here. White shark: A 3-D finite-element model predicted the bite of a very large individual; it was not measured on a living shark.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Its wide head is a sensory platform, not just an unusual silhouette. Its headline bite number is a computer model, not a live-animal measurement.
TRACE THE CLAIMS