Megamouth shark is about 1.16× longer by these reference values.
Megamouth shark uses a 7.1 m upper reference, compared with 6.1 m for Great hammerhead. Megamouth shark's weight reference is about 2.7× heavier.
ON THE SAME SCALE
Human. Bus. Whale.
Pick your reference.
Length bars use upper comparison values and do not show body depth, tail proportion or typical adult size. A long thresher tail, for example, does not equal whale-shark body mass.
THE NUMBERS
Side by side.
WHAT THE DATA CAN SAY
Size is not the whole animal.
Length and weight
Great hammerhead is represented by reported to 6.1 m / 20 ft; Megamouth shark by reported to about 7.1 m / 23 ft. The comparison uses the largest reported length and a record mass. Sparse specimens make a true maximum difficult to establish.
Bite evidence
Great hammerhead: Comparative biomechanics exist, but a simple verified maximum is not established here. Megamouth shark: This filter feeder lacks a comparable maximum-bite study.
Living versus extinct
Both species are living, but record-sized individuals are rare. These upper references should not be read as normal adult size.
Ecology changes the matchup
Its wide head is a sensory platform, not just an unusual silhouette. Known from relatively few encounters, it still carries major uncertainty.
TRACE THE CLAIMS